Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_February_11


February 11

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Courts of Audit

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated category SMasonGarrison 12:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Amateur water polo

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Redundant category layer. SMasonGarrison 12:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Amateur swimming

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Redundant category layer. SMasonGarrison 12:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former unidentified serial killers

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: A rather arbitrary category, based on a nondefining characteristic. Not to say, sloppily named: I guess the intention was "Formerly unidentified serial killers". --Altenmann >talk 11:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Peabody, Massachusetts, by occupation

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Subcategory with just two entries. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Peabody, Massachusetts

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Subcategory with just two entries. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:45, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated this category incorrectly. Could some administrator please close it. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former religious buildings and structures in Philadelphia

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer. Only 1 subcategory. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:28, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The category has two sub-categories; with one sub-category containing three articles and the other sub-category containing seven articles, relating to former churches in Philadelphia. It is possible that there may be other former religious buildings, not currently identified as former, to be added to this category. Rangasyd (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:13, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sports events in Russia by month

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: A large volume of sparsely populated month categories, most with one or two pages each. Merge to continent categories must be manual since Russia is a transcontinental country. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oceania television station stubs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. You can just tag these categories CSD G7 when you are the category creator and only editor. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television stations in the United States by insular area

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]



The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Murdered American gangsters by criminal organization

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There's no need to isolate the specific organization, assuming we want to diffuse at the intersection of cause of death and occupation, and organization. SMasonGarrison 14:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recreation

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, not a clear distinction between the two categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, except I would merge Category:Leisure activities into Category:Recreation. My reasoning is based on WP:CATNAME, which says Standard article naming conventions apply, and WP:CRITERIA favors WP:CONCISE titles. "Recreation" is more concise than "Leisure activities". All of the other naming criteria seems roughly similar between the two choices. — hike395 (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Things are a bit messy because right now we have the category structure Leisure -> (Leisure activities, Entertainment, Travel) and Leisure activities -> Recreation. If we assume the usual definitions ("Leisure" = free time apart from work, chores, etc.; "Recreation" = fun/pleasant activities someone engages in during leisure time, "Entertainment" = activities that someone passively enjoys during leisure time, "Travel" = going somewhere else during leisure time), then really all of Recreation/Entertainment/Travel are Leisure activities. To me, this means that Leisure activities should go away and Recreation should be promoted in its place.
Per Aidan's point: I think that Massage (to the extent that it isn't medical) probably belongs in Entertainment (??). I'm dubious that Bathing actually belongs to leisure (i.e., it's generally considered a requirement for most people).
Note also that we'll have to do something about Picnic and Amateurism, both of which are subcategories of Leisure. — hike395 (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]